Freight CO2 calculator: sea vs air for a garment shipment
Enter the weight of a shipment and where it is going, and see its tonne-kilometres and emissions by sea from Chattogram and by air from Dhaka, the air figure with and without the extra warming of flying at altitude, and how many times the sea figure it is.
Air against sea
12.4 times
the CO2e by air, without the altitude effect; 20.9 times with it. Shipment of 1,442.1 kg.
- Sea: distance
- 21,374 km
- Sea: tonne-km
- 30,823
- Sea: emissions
- 497 kg CO2e
- Air: distance
- 8,015 km
- Air: tonne-km
- 11,558
- Air: emissions without the altitude effect
- 6,141 kg CO2e
- Air: emissions with the altitude effect (RF)
- 10,395 kg CO2e
By air to London Heathrow, this shipment emits 12.4 times the CO2e of sending it by sea to Felixstowe, around the Cape of Good Hope, or 20.9 times counting the extra warming of flying at altitude. Per tonne-kilometre, air is 33.0 times sea; the gap here is smaller because the sea route is 2.7 times as long as the flight.
kg CO2e per tonne-km: sea 0.01612, air 0.5313 without and 0.89939 with the altitude effect, burning the fuel only. An estimate for comparing the two, not a certified footprint.
In short
Emissions are weight in tonnes × distance in kilometres × an emission factor, here the UK Government’s 2026 factors: 0.01612 kg CO2e per tonne-kilometre for an average container ship and 0.5313 kg for a freight flight, or 0.89939 kg with the warming effect of flying at altitude. For 209 cartons of t-shirts weighing 1,442.1 kg, flying to London Heathrow emits about 6,141 kg CO2e, and shipping to Felixstowe about 497 kg around the Cape of Good Hope or 340 kg through the Suez Canal: air is 12.4 to 18.0 times sea, or 20.9 to 30.6 times with the altitude effect. It is an estimate for comparing the two, not a certified footprint. Nothing you enter is sent anywhere. CMB Sourcing Ltd. is a buying house: partner factories make the order and we manage it.
How the emissions are worked out
The weight of the shipment in tonnes times the distance in kilometres gives tonne-kilometres, the unit freight emission factors are published in. Each mode’s tonne-kilometres are multiplied by its factor from the UK Government’s greenhouse gas conversion factors for company reporting, published every year by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero: in 2026, 0.01612 kg CO2e per tonne-kilometre for an average container ship, and 0.5313 kg for an international freight flight. Weight is the actual gross weight of the goods, not the chargeable weight an airline bills, which is often higher for clothing.
For flights the government publishes a second factor, 0.89939 kg, that adds the indirect warming of what aircraft emit at altitude, such as contrails and water vapour, as a 70% increase on the carbon dioxide. Its guidance is to include it, with a warning that its size is scientifically uncertain, so the calculator shows both. Ticking “well-to-tank” adds the emissions of producing and delivering the fuel (0.00365 kg by sea, 0.13516 kg by air), which ISO 14083, the international standard for transport emissions, counts in total emissions.
Sea distances are from the US government’s Distances Between Ports (Pub. 151), adding up its sections through the Suez Canal, the Cape of Good Hope or Singapore; nautical miles × 1.852 = kilometres. Flight distances are great-circle distances from Dhaka’s Hazrat Shahjalal airport (23.843347, 90.397783), worked out from airport coordinates on a sphere of 6,371 km. The air factors already add 8% to the great-circle distance for indirect routes and circling, so nothing is added here.
What it leaves out
It is an estimate for comparing sea and air, not a certified footprint. The factors are averages: a large container ship emits less per tonne-kilometre than the average, and the small feeder ship that carries a container from Chattogram to a hub such as Colombo or Singapore emits more. Real voyages are longer than the shortest navigable route, and a guide to ISO 14083 gives 15% as the common allowance for that. Flights often change planes at a hub. The trucking to the port or airport, time at the hubs, and delivery at your end are not counted. Pub. 151 is the 2001 edition; distances between ports change little, but the route your ship takes does, so ask your forwarder whether it goes through the Suez Canal or around the Cape. The calculator opens on the Cape, the longer of the two, so its sea figure is the higher one and the gap to air the smaller.
For a figure you report, the method your framework asks for decides the details: ISO 14083 and the GLEC Framework, the industry guide from Smart Freight Centre, set rules for distances and fuel. Use your forwarder’s actual weights and routes, and ask whether it can report the shipment’s emissions from its own fuel data. Our guide to sea vs air freight for clothing weighs cost and time against the carbon, the container load calculator turns cartons into volume and air chargeable weight, and sustainable clothing manufacturing covers the certificates that back a product claim.
The factors, routes and distances the calculator uses
| Factor | Where it is in the spreadsheet | kg CO2e per tonne-km |
|---|---|---|
| Sea: container ship, average | Freighting goods → Cargo ship → Container ship → Average | 0.01612 |
| Air: freight flight, without RF | Freighting goods → Freight flights → International, to/from non-UK → Without RF | 0.5313 |
| Air: freight flight, with RF | Freighting goods → Freight flights → International, to/from non-UK → With RF | 0.89939 |
| Sea: fuel production (well-to-tank) | WTT- delivery vehs & freight → WTT- cargo ship → Container ship → Average | 0.00365 |
| Air: fuel production (well-to-tank) | WTT- delivery vehs & freight → WTT- freight flights → International, to/from non-UK | 0.13516 |
| Port | Route | Sections (nautical miles) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Felixstowe (UK) | Around the Cape of Good Hope | Cape of Good Hope 5,492 + Ushant (Ile d’Ouessant) 5,746 + Felixstowe 303 | 11,541 nm (21,374 km) |
| Felixstowe (UK) | Through the Suez Canal | Port Said (Suez Canal) 4,739 + Strait of Gibraltar 1,943 + Ushant (Ile d’Ouessant) 918 + Felixstowe 303 | 7,903 nm (14,636 km) |
| Rotterdam (EU) | Around the Cape of Good Hope | Cape of Good Hope 5,492 + Ushant (Ile d’Ouessant) 5,746 + Rotterdam 444 | 11,682 nm (21,635 km) |
| Rotterdam (EU) | Through the Suez Canal | Port Said (Suez Canal) 4,739 + Strait of Gibraltar 1,943 + Ushant (Ile d’Ouessant) 918 + Rotterdam 444 | 8,044 nm (14,897 km) |
| Hamburg (EU) | Around the Cape of Good Hope | Cape of Good Hope 5,492 + Ushant (Ile d’Ouessant) 5,746 + Hamburg 703 | 11,941 nm (22,115 km) |
| Hamburg (EU) | Through the Suez Canal | Port Said (Suez Canal) 4,739 + Strait of Gibraltar 1,943 + Ushant (Ile d’Ouessant) 918 + Hamburg 703 | 8,303 nm (15,377 km) |
| Antwerp (EU) | Around the Cape of Good Hope | Cape of Good Hope 5,492 + Ushant (Ile d’Ouessant) 5,746 + Antwerp 441 | 11,679 nm (21,630 km) |
| Antwerp (EU) | Through the Suez Canal | Port Said (Suez Canal) 4,739 + Strait of Gibraltar 1,943 + Ushant (Ile d’Ouessant) 918 + Antwerp 441 | 8,041 nm (14,892 km) |
| Barcelona (EU) | Around the Cape of Good Hope | Cape of Good Hope 5,492 + Strait of Gibraltar 5,082 + Barcelona 534 | 11,108 nm (20,572 km) |
| Barcelona (EU) | Through the Suez Canal | Port Said (Suez Canal) 4,739 + Barcelona 1,600 | 6,339 nm (11,740 km) |
| Valencia (EU) | Around the Cape of Good Hope | Cape of Good Hope 5,492 + Strait of Gibraltar 5,082 + Valencia 403 | 10,977 nm (20,329 km) |
| Valencia (EU) | Through the Suez Canal | Port Said (Suez Canal) 4,739 + Valencia 1,679 | 6,418 nm (11,886 km) |
| New York–New Jersey (US) | Around the Cape of Good Hope | Cape of Good Hope 5,492 + New York 6,814 | 12,306 nm (22,791 km) |
| New York–New Jersey (US) | Through the Suez Canal | Port Said (Suez Canal) 4,739 + Strait of Gibraltar 1,943 + New York 3,180 | 9,862 nm (18,264 km) |
| Los Angeles–Long Beach (US) | Via Singapore | Singapore 1,517 + Los Angeles 7,867 | 9,384 nm (17,379 km) |
| Vancouver (Canada) | Via Singapore | Singapore 1,517 + Vancouver 7,078 | 8,595 nm (15,918 km) |
| Halifax (Canada) | Around the Cape of Good Hope | Cape of Good Hope 5,492 + Halifax 6,502 | 11,994 nm (22,213 km) |
| Halifax (Canada) | Through the Suez Canal | Port Said (Suez Canal) 4,739 + Strait of Gibraltar 1,943 + Halifax 2,708 | 9,390 nm (17,390 km) |
| Sydney (Australia) | Via Singapore | Singapore 1,517 + Selat Wetar 1,587 + Torres Strait 881 + Sydney 1,670 | 5,655 nm (10,473 km) |
| Melbourne (Australia) | Via Singapore | Singapore 1,517 + Selat Sunda 532 + Cape Leeuwin 1,815 + Melbourne 1,497 | 5,361 nm (9,929 km) |
| Auckland (New Zealand) | Via Singapore | Singapore 1,517 + Selat Wetar 1,587 + Torres Strait 881 + Auckland 2,485 | 6,470 nm (11,982 km) |
| Airport | Latitude, longitude | Great-circle distance |
|---|---|---|
| London Heathrow (LHR, UK) | 51.470748, -0.459909 | 8,015 km |
| Frankfurt (FRA, EU) | 50.026706, 8.55835 | 7,433 km |
| Paris Charles de Gaulle (CDG, EU) | 49.00896, 2.554117 | 7,880 km |
| Amsterdam Schiphol (AMS, EU) | 52.308601, 4.76389 | 7,645 km |
| New York JFK (JFK, US) | 40.639447, -73.779317 | 12,661 km |
| Los Angeles (LAX) (LAX, US) | 33.942501, -118.407997 | 12,904 km |
| Toronto Pearson (YYZ) (YYZ, Canada) | 43.675935, -79.629421 | 12,439 km |
| Sydney (SYD, Australia) | -33.946098, 151.177002 | 9,083 km |
| Melbourne (MEL, Australia) | -37.670732, 144.837898 | 8,893 km |
| Auckland (AKL, New Zealand) | -37.01199, 174.786331 | 11,108 km |
Sources
Checked . Rules and figures change, so confirm anything that affects your pricing.
- Department for Energy Security and Net Zero: Greenhouse gas reporting: conversion factors 2026 (full set published 11 June 2026). Freighting goods: cargo ship, container ship, average 0.01612; freight flights, international to/from non-UK and long-haul to/from UK, 0.89939 with RF and 0.5313 without; WTT freight flights 0.13516 and WTT container ship average 0.00365, all kg CO2e per tonne.km. The 2025 set gives the same figures (opens in a new tab)
- Department for Energy Security and Net Zero: 2026 Government greenhouse gas conversion factors for company reporting, methodology paper (June 2026): the 8% uplift on great-circle flight distances already in the air factors (paragraphs 8.37–8.38), and non-CO2 effects and radiative forcing (8.39 onwards) (opens in a new tab)
- National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (US): Distances Between Ports, Pub. 151, eleventh edition (2001), in nautical miles: Chittagong, junction points and each destination port’s entry (opens in a new tab)
- OurAirports: open data downloads, airports.csv (airport latitude and longitude, regenerated daily; downloaded 17 October 2026) (opens in a new tab)
- CLECAT: Guide to ISO 14083, Greenhouse gas emissions in the transport sector (2024, based on the German Environment Agency’s guide by ifeu and Fraunhofer IML): total emissions as energy provision plus operation; great-circle distance always for air, and the shortest feasible or the great-circle distance for other modes; common distance adjustments of GCD + 95 km for air and SFD + 15% for sea (table 3) (opens in a new tab)
Freight emissions questions.
How much more CO2 does air freight produce than sea freight?
Per tonne-kilometre, about 33 times as much, or about 56 times counting the extra warming effect of flying at altitude. Those are the UK Government’s 2026 greenhouse gas conversion factors: 0.5313 kg of CO2 equivalent per tonne-kilometre for an international freight flight, or 0.89939 kg with that effect, against 0.01612 kg for an average container ship. For one shipment the gap also depends on the two distances, because the sea route is usually longer than the flight. In the calculator’s opening example, 209 cartons of t-shirts weighing 1,442.1 kg, flying from Dhaka to London Heathrow emits about 6,141 kg CO2e, or 10,395 kg with the altitude effect, while shipping from Chattogram to Felixstowe around the Cape of Good Hope emits about 497 kg. Air is 12.4 times sea, or 20.9 times with the altitude effect. Through the Suez Canal the sea route is shorter, the sea figure falls to about 340 kg, and air is 18.0 times sea. These are estimates for comparing the two modes, not a measured footprint, but no realistic route closes a gap of that size.
What is radiative forcing, and should air freight emissions include it?
Radiative forcing (RF) here means the extra warming caused by what aircraft emit at altitude besides carbon dioxide, such as water vapour, contrails and nitrogen oxides. The UK Government’s conversion factors publish two figures for freight flights: one for the direct emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide only, 0.5313 kg CO2e per tonne-kilometre in 2026, and one that adds these indirect effects as a 70% increase on the carbon dioxide part, 0.89939 kg. The government’s guidance is that organisations should include the indirect effects to capture the full climate impact of air freight, and it says plainly that there is significant scientific uncertainty about their size. It treats aviation as the only form of transport where these effects are significant, so the sea factor has no equivalent. The calculator shows the air figure both ways, so you can see the range. If you report the result, say which figure you used, and use the same one every year so the trend means something.
How is the carbon footprint of a freight shipment calculated?
Multiply the weight in tonnes by the distance in kilometres to get tonne-kilometres, then multiply by an emission factor for the mode, in kg CO2e per tonne-kilometre. In the calculator’s opening example, 1.4421 tonnes shipped 21,374 km from Chattogram to Felixstowe around the Cape is 30,823 tonne-kilometres, and at the UK Government’s 2026 factor of 0.01612 kg for an average container ship that is about 497 kg CO2e. Use the actual gross weight of the goods, not the air chargeable weight a freight bill uses. For a flight, use the great-circle distance between the airports: the government’s air factors already include an 8% uplift for indirect routes, stacking and circling, so do not add your own. The factors cover burning the fuel. Producing and delivering the fuel is listed separately as well-to-tank, 0.00365 kg per tonne-kilometre for a container ship and 0.13516 kg for a freight flight, and ISO 14083, the international standard for transport emissions, counts it in total emissions; with it included, the example comes to about 609 kg by sea and 7,703 kg by air. For a figure you publish, use your forwarder’s actual weights and routes, and ask whether it can report the shipment’s emissions from its own fuel data.
Where do the calculator’s sea and air distances come from?
Sea distances come from Distances Between Ports (Pub. 151), published by the US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, eleventh edition, 2001, the edition the agency offers for download. It gives each port’s distance to junction points such as the Suez Canal, the Cape of Good Hope and Singapore, and a route is the sum of its sections. Chattogram to Felixstowe is 11,541 nautical miles (21,374 km) around the Cape and 7,903 (14,636 km) through Suez; to Sydney, through Singapore and the Torres Strait, 5,655 (10,473 km). These are mostly the shortest navigable routes, and real voyages are longer: a container first goes by feeder ship to a hub such as Colombo or Singapore, and a guide to ISO 14083 gives 15% as the common allowance between the shortest feasible and the actual sea distance. Flight distances are great-circle distances between the airports, worked out from the coordinates in the OurAirports open dataset: Dhaka to London Heathrow is 8,015 km. Air freight often changes planes at a hub; for that, choose another airport and type the sum of the legs. If your forwarder gives you the distance of your own route, type it in the same way.
Planning the shipping with the order?
Send your styles, quantities and destination, and ask for the order quoted FOB, CIF and DDP, so you can compare the shipping terms side by side.
- A reply within one working day
- An enquiry, not an order: you are committed to an order only when you sign the written order confirmation
- Certificates and audit reports shared before production
- AQL final inspection report before you approve shipment
- NDA signed on request before you share designs